My ADHD brain is always whirring on this: we’re living in a system that’s designed to prevent that participation.
A market economy that’s turned community into a luxury product.
And it’s killing our neighbourhoods.
But we need to go on a little journey back in time to get back to where we are today, and what you can do.
The £50 bench that taught us everything.
Twenty years ago, we bought our flat at the end of a cul-de-sac in Newbury Park, London, and bought a picnic bench to put outside our front door.
£50 from B&Q. Nothing revolutionary.
We were already talking to our neighbours anyway. But now we had somewhere to sit while we talked.
Our flat was designed so we had to go out the front door to get to the back garden. So that bench became where people naturally paused and started conversations.
Kids would do homework there after school. Neighbours would pause during walks and join conversations already happening.
We got together with the people in our small block and turned our separate back gardens into one big shared garden with a BBQ. Summer evenings, we’d all eat together at least once a week.
We were amazed. We’d been doing most of those things anyway. We hadn’t needed a guide to show us how.
I’d love to tell you the solution is we all buy a bench and sit outside our houses. But the reality is that most people don’t have schedules flexible enough to chat with neighbours during the day. That option simply isn’t available to everyone.
Amy, the exhausted creative producer, was watching parents choose between career and children.
In 2016, Amy Martin gave a TED talk about what she’d been seeing as Creative Producer at Impact Hub Birmingham.
Parents working just to afford childcare fees that “duplicate a household mortgage or rent payment.”
The market economy in action: turning care into commodity.
This was nine years ago. Amy launched #RadicalChildcare in 2017-2018, not as another premium service for wealthy parents, but as community infrastructure.
Recognising that the current childcare system is powered by 98% women, often under 21, paid minimum wage despite being the “architects of our children’s brains” during the years when 85% of brain development happens.
I don’t have the exact stats for today, but I’ve read enough to know it doesn’t feel like it’s changed dramatically for the better since Amy’s TED talk.
Since that time, I’ve watched many conversations explode around childcare, and many people have attempted to develop coworking and childcare solutions as answers to issues that arose in that radical childcare conversation all those years ago.
Amy asked a different question.
Not: “How do we make childcare more profitable?”
But: “How do we make it community infrastructure?”
calls this the difference between the Market Economy and the Creative Economy.
The Market Economy organises around scarcity. It treats care as a transaction. It creates what Block calls “the narrative of deficiency”—parents become consumers with problems to solve, not citizens with gifts to contribute.
The Creative Economy operates from the conviction that there is enough. It asks: “What are you good at? What are you willing to teach others?”
Shazia, the working mother in London who rejected impossible choices.
Seventeen years ago, in 2008, Shazia Mustafa had an idea.
She wanted to work flexibly around her child, and she realised other parents wanted the same thing.
The problem wasn’t that childcare costs were eating into her household income.
The problem was that existing childcare meant leaving your children for the full day, whether you needed to or not.
As Shazia puts it: “I set up Third Door to create a solution that worked for modern-day parents like me.”
Shazia created London’s first coworking space with an onsite Ofsted-registered nursery.
This was years before coworking became mainstream. Most people barely knew what it was.
As a new parent in 2011 and a coworking fanatic, I always wanted to visit Third Door but it was on the other side of town. Navigating London on the ground with a buggy, even outside rush hour, it was a bridge too far.
Shazia rejected the Market Economy principle that work and family must be separate consumer choices.
Instead, she created Creative Economy infrastructure: a place where parents could participate in both work and family life, in the same building, at the same time.
Imandeep, the community organiser, chose collective ownership over extraction.
Imandeep ‘Immy’ Kaur, the Sikh community organiser in Birmingham, had been walking past the same derelict brownfield site in Ladywood for 22 years, watching it sit abandoned and uncared for.
When rising rents forced Impact Hub Birmingham out in 2020—after the landlords jacked up prices specifically because of the success her community had brought to the area—she and her neighbours refused to play by extraction rules anymore.
Personally, I watched Impact Hub Birmingham close elegantly with a series of events and was intrigued by CIVIC SQUARE‘s evolution. It’s amazing how fast it actually evolved.
“Collectively, all of us, lots of us, we were like: ‘No more begging cap in hand for rights to things that should be human rights.’”
Together they bought a barge, parked it in Birmingham’s canals, and four years later the community owned land outright with a covenant protecting it “in perpetuity.”
From rent victims to collective landowners. From consumers to citizens.
That conversation became Civic Square. A space where residents lead their own transformation instead of waiting for someone else to save their neighbourhood.
Immy’s principle: “inch wide, mile deep movements that schism the existing paradigm.”
Irene, the architect, proved they weren’t just lucky accidents.
This isn’t just inspiring anecdotes.
Irene Manzini Ceinar, PhD, architect, urbanist, researcher, and placeshaper in London and Reggio Emilia, spent years proving, with hard data, that what Amy, Shazia, and Imandeep figured out intuitively actually works as social infrastructure.
Her comparative research of Community-Centred spaces shows that 60% of users get involved in local civic organisations.
That 33% of nearby businesses report increased revenue thanks to the partnership with these spaces. They use “spreading strategies”—encouraging members to buy food locally rather than from chain stores.
The numbers prove these aren’t just nice community spaces. They’re measurably strengthening neighbourhoods.
During COVID, whilst profit-driven coworking chains shut down, Community-Centred spaces became essential infrastructure.
SPACE4 ran digital skills workshops for fifty local businesses. HUG in Milan provided free meals to elderly and vulnerable residents. Islington Council financially supported Space4 to deliver social services, recognising its vital role for community sustainability.
But Irene’s research also reveals the system working against these spaces. Even Space4—one of the successful examples—shows the barriers.
Only 33% of locals knew about their social services.
Only 20% knew about pay-what-you-can options.
The very people who need these resources most don’t know they exist.
Meanwhile, spaces with social purpose exist in what Irene calls a “grey area” for funding. During COVID, HUG in Milan received no public financial aid because it wasn’t classified as a standard business. The Market Economy’s funding structures can’t even recognise community infrastructure when they see it.
Irene also helped organise the Hackney workshop at Mainyard Studios where McKenzie Lad in his hoodie called out my jargon:
He was right. I was performing tribal identity that excludes people like him.
The pattern Irene’s research reveals: the academic world has been studying this for years. Since 2015, the Research Group on Collaborative Spaces has been documenting how some spaces build community while others extract value.
The industry largely ignores this research. Instead, it follows sponsored reports that tell property companies what they want to hear about scaling and profit.
Why do Marc and Rachel face different barriers to the same citizenship?
Marc, the “Brotiopia” startup founder in his Patagonia vest, and Rachel, the single mum working two jobs to keep her child housed while building her food business, are both citizens of the same neighbourhood.
But the system treats them very differently.
Marc has inherited wealth and flexible work. He can attend neighbourhood meetings because his schedule is his own. He can afford the £50 bench and the time to chat with neighbours during the day.
Rachel doesn’t have time for neighbourhood meetings because she’s working a night shift at the hospital after running her food stall all day. The cost-of-living crisis has squeezed her so hard that participation feels like a luxury she can’t afford.
This isn’t about individual choices.
It’s about how the Market Economy creates scarcity thinking that prevents community.
Peter Block argues that we need “connectors”—uncredentialled people who specialise in bringing together peers, strangers, and neighbours to create trust and improve places.
Rachel has gifts to contribute—she knows everyone on her street, understands what local families actually need, and creates food that brings people together.
But the system treats her as a consumer with problems, not a citizen with solutions.
Marc has time and money to organise. But without Rachel’s knowledge and connections, any “community” he creates will be extraction dressed up as participation.
The system that creates alienation.
Look at what’s actually happening: youth service budgets slashed from £145 million to £42 million. At least 130 youth centres closed. Around 30% of youth clubs shut down.
The civic and economic infrastructure that enabled participation has been defunded, sold off, or turned into luxury products.
Meanwhile, expensive coworking spaces tout “community” while erecting economic barriers to participation.
High membership fees filter for “the right people.”
Childcare becomes an upsell for wealthy parents.
They extract value from neighbourhoods without contributing to local life. Target affluent demographics whilst pricing out people who actually need affordable workspace.
This isn’t accidental. It’s the Market Economy treating community as commodity.
As Block puts it: “The market context dictates a narrative filled with polarisation, conflict, and wrongdoing, primarily focusing on what is not working.”
Starting conversations that turn reading into doing.
Talking with other people who are doing this work turns it from being something you read on the internet or in a book into something you can do right now.
Every month, we host Unreasonable Connection calls where community builders share what’s actually happening.
Real conversations with coworking community builders who are like Amy, examining how care becomes infrastructure. Like Shazia, proving that work and family don’t have to be separate consumer choices. Like Immy, choosing collective ownership over extraction.
One hour. Real people. Real intention.
Because when you hear someone else solving the same problem you’re facing, it stops being impossible and becomes Tuesday’s project.
Want to start these conversations in your own community?
Host a screening of ACTionism —the 25-minute documentary about neighbours working together. All you need is a computer and a few people. Put up some chairs, press play, and let people talk afterwards.
It’s not an instruction manual or solution. It’s a conversation starter.
How to Save Democracy: Neighbourhood Power
This isn’t about making better personal choices. It’s about examining how power works and who gets to participate.
If you’re running a community space and feeling like you’re swimming against the tide of extraction, gentrification, and rising rents, this conversation is for you.
Jon Alexander is sitting down with Imandeep Kaur and Indy Johar to explore what it looks like when neighbourhoods drive their own transformation.
This isn’t theoretical. Imandeep is the person you just read about - the Sikh community organiser who went from “rent victims to collective landowners” in Birmingham. She’ll be sharing how Civic Square actually works: how they moved from begging cap in hand to owning land “in perpetuity.”
has been advising behind the scenes, helping frame what community infrastructure looks like when it’s designed for participation, not extraction, many of you reading this will know Indy as one of the ‘OG’s of what is now the Impact Hub London community.
If you’re asking yourself, “How do I create more Creative Economy and less Market Economy in my area?” - this is where you get practical answers.
How do you build the kind of “local coupling points” that Irene’s research proves work? How do you create spreading strategies that strengthen your neighbourhood instead of extracting from it?
Because the gap between Amy’s vision for childcare as community infrastructure, Shazia’s model of work-life integration, and Imandeep’s collective ownership isn’t luck. It’s learnable. It’s replicable. It requires the kind of “inch wide, mile deep” approach they’ll be discussing.
👉 How to Save Democracy: Neighbourhood Power Mon 1 Dec, 6pm – 7:30pm in person OR Online via YouTube 6:15 - click on the YouTube Link to RSVP.
Unreasonable Connection Going Live! London Feb 2025
And in February, Unreasonable Connection Going Live! in London—a whole day of coworking community builders working with each other, not just listening to presentations.
We’re designing it together with everyone who joins the waitlist. When you get to the room in February, you’ll have helped create what we talk about all day.
If you’ve ever felt like the only person in the room who thinks coworking should be about community infrastructure, not premium real estate extraction, you’ll finally find your people.
No venture capital success stories. No “scale at all costs” case studies. Just independent operators sharing what actually works when you’re building for neighbours, not investors. The conversations that turn “I’m the only one thinking like this” into “There are dozens of us doing this work.”
Because participation in how we solve these problems is exactly what we’re talking about.
Join the co-creator waitlist—we’re limiting it to 150 people.
Monday: Buy coffee from the nearest independent shop instead of Starbucks. Talk to whoever’s working.
Because participation starts with choosing local over extraction. One conversation at a time, you stop being a consumer passing through your neighbourhood and start being a citizen who lives there.
In a system designed around extraction and alienation, participation is a form of resistance.
Bernie Picks:
🤝 Unreasonable Connection Our monthly online gathering for coworking space owners and community managers. Small groups, ‘pukka’ conversations, no bollocks.
Next session: Wednesday, December 17th 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM GMT+1. Find it here.
📚 Adrienne Maree Brown - Emergent Strategy The source of “inch-wide, mile-deep change” - essential reading for anyone building transformative community work.
📊 Research Group on Collaborative Spaces - Academic research the industry ignores: how “community,” “creativity,” and “independence” get mobilised within capitalist logics. Berlin Symposium March 5th and 6th 2026
📱 Wispr Flow Being dyslexic and having ADHD, I ALWAYS prefer talking over typing. I’ve always found Apple Dictation on my Mac and iPhone to be very good, but Wispr Flow is significantly better. Its impressive accuracy and consistency across all apps even beat Apple Dictation.